The perfect choice of one-stop service for diversification of architecture.
Who Is Better to Install This Year? Six Mid and High-end CPU Scuffles: AMD's Omni-directional Suppre
This year, due to the strong return of AMD, this situation has finally been overturned. Although E3 is lost, the introduction of ryzen series gives a lot of choices to the mainstream market of 1000 2500.
In fact, for everyone, each computer only needs one CPU, so who has the ability to become standard? Let's do a detailed comparison test today.
About the test of this article:
In this paper, the CPU test will be divided into four parts: CPU performance test, with unique use test, disk performance test and power consumption test, so as to help you understand the actual use performance of CPU from many aspects.
Since the comparison test will use the previous test data, in order to ensure the consistency of the comparison, I will still try to use the same version of test software, driver, BIOS, etc. used in the previous test.
At present, there are many updates related to ryzen, and there are different opinions on the extent of improvement. At present, there is no way to upgrade the test platform (mainly the graphics card. Due to boost, the test results of N card will differ every time, so only a card can be used). Therefore, it may have to wait until the AMD Vega graphics card is released before unified retesting.
CPU specifications and drawings
The main comparison object of this test is the CPU of 1000 2500 yuan.
Intel includes i7-7700k and i7-7500, two classic models (in terms of product positioning). Amd uses the full range of ryzen 5 products, and 1700 will be put in the overall comparison.
The picture appreciation part mainly appreciates the 1400, 1600 and 7500 which are not many pieces in the ordinary test. The appearance of CPU and package is basically the same as that of R7. The difference is that 7 on the package becomes 5.
The CPU is still in a standard plastic protective case with a small sticker.
There are obvious differences on the radiator. 1400 will be much smaller than 1600.
By comparing the base, we can know that the 1600 adopts the same radiator as the 1700, while the 1400 radiator is a lower level model without copper plug. This also shows that 1400 power consumption will be much lower.
The 7500 in this test is a loose piece, which should be the same as most choices, so there is no box to show.
Intel's original is like this. Compared with AMD's radiator, it is much thinner.
Product test platform: the following is the detailed configuration table of the test platform, mainly comparing the following 6 models.
The motherboard tested uses the mainstream B350. Because XFR is not supported, the test results will be slightly lower than those on x370, basically within 2%, depending on the improvement of XFR.
Intel's test motherboard uses z270 Phoenix gaming.
The memory is the DDR4 8g * 4 of the pirate ship. The actual operating frequency is 2133c15.
The graphics card adopts sapphire 480 8g ultra platinum.
SSD is three Intel, and the system disk uses the mainstream 535 to ensure that the test is closer to ordinary users. 240g is used as the system disk, and 480g * 2 is mainly used to play test games. There are more and more games, so we can only add SSD.
In order to test the PCI-E efficiency of the chipset later, 750 400g is also used here.
The radiator is owl u12s.
