HD Camera/Ipod Touch 4G Help?

You can consider Flip Video Ultra High Definition Camcorder With 8GB Memory - Black Easy-to-use, pocket-sized camcorder with one-touch recording and digital zoom Captures 120 minutes of HD video on 8 GB of built-in memory Convenient flip-out USB arm plugs directly into your PC or Mac to launch FlipShare software Built-In FlipShare software lets you edit, email or upload video to sharing sites like YouTube and MySpace Integrated HDMI port for high-definition TV output

1. What's your opinion on BTS's new song "DNA"?

I do not like it at all. When I saw this I was quite shocked because I know bts can do better. At First I was wondering if it would be good. From my opinion, the song and video is just awful it may be good for armys and non kpop fans. In general I rate it one out of ten. The video is too colour full. I hate the introduction. Bts was another group I listened to when I started to discover kpop but then my opinion of them in that video changed. I was thinking no way this song or video is good because if it was they would have a better concept. Dope was better generally because it got more popularity and love. Since DNA came out. I hate it a lot. It's just mediocre as a kpop fan who tries to listen to other groups. For me that's how I feel. I do not even know why people love the music video and the song itself. DNA is meaning less no meaning makes it dull. I prefer blood sweat and tears. The only songs I liked was blood and sweat tears, Run, I need you, Fire, Dope.What is so good about it? So what if it's good? It's never going to be my favourite. I disagree with the fans and it's not the best. I only like bts because of their music and Rap monster. Furthermore the choreography and their clothes look bloody awful. UGH YET ALONE THE COLOURS. I heard blood sweat and tears before and other songs. From all the music videos bts has made or created. This is the worst one I've heard of seen. I really hate this song. It's always been on my suggestions. No way I would ever bloody like it. Yet people who like it say it's the best. If it was good why do they use so much auto tune? Why is the choreography so horrible?

2. OK.....Techies...I need some help Plz!!!...... Macbook Air or Refurbed Pro??

If you have no need for a dvd/cd drive, firewire, ethernet port, and other ports and you ar not running video editing or graphic design programs then go for the Air. Its lighter, thinner, and easier to bring around. You said you had a iMac so I am assuming thats your main computer. I have a refurb MacbookPro and love it. I run Video (Final cut Pro), photo (Photoshop, InDesign), and music (Ableton Live) and it never bogs down. So again it comes down to: 1) whether you need the speed for your work 2) whether you will ever use the dvd/cd drive or other ports

3. Rape video on phone

This sounds like it would fall under the "extreme pornography" part of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. Section 63:(7) An image falls within this subsection if it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, any of the following-(b) an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals,and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person or animal was real. (7A) An image falls within this subsection if it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, either of the following-(b) an act which involves the non-consensual sexual penetration of a person's vagina or anus by another with a part of the other person's body or anything else,and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that the persons were real. What you describe would likely result in serious injury to the victim, and the video appears to be non-consensual.Note that the actual origin is not relevant; if the videos were actually a brilliant piece of special effects and no anuses were harmed that gets you nowhere. The only thing that matters is what a "reasonable person" looking at the videos would have thought. Context might make a difference; if the videos were made by an identifiable company then a reasonable person might assume the producers would have at least obtained consent and complied with their local laws about safety. OTOH if they look like they were filmed on someone's phone and downloaded from some sketchy file-sharing site then a jury is likely to see this as suggesting to the "reasonable person" that the acts shown were real and non-consensual.Edit in response to comment:The law in question says 'An image is "pornographic" if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal'. So it can still be porn even if it was not filmed consensually. If "pornography" could only refer to consensual images then the prosecution would need to obtain evidence of the consent or otherwise of the participants. This might be impossible if a participant is dead or cannot be identified. Also the definition above matches both the dictionary definition and most people's idea of what makes something "porn"; the point of porn is sexual arousal